Using Web 2.0 tools for formative and summative assessments
can be very powerful. These tools
can provide students with a high degree of differentiated, self-paced
instruction. The tools can be
accessed 24/7, which means students who are struggling or who want to explore
the subject matter in more depth may do so outside of the regular school day. These tools can be very powerful for me
as a teacher, too. They can
provide more time-appropriate data on student progress, which reduces my time
spent on grading, allowing me to focus on creating an environment where
students achieve mastery based on their learning modalities and individual
needs.
As a teacher, it is my role to make sure the tools for
formative assessment allow me to monitor students’ progress effectively. By following Tuttle’s Stages of
Formative Assessment and providing feedback – either online or in the
classroom, or , most likely, both - at regular intervals throughout the learning process, I can
monitor and evaluate student learning.
Students can self-monitor and learn from the feedback they’ve received
from me and from their peers. They
reach the level of meta-cognition, where they know how to problem solve and use
strategies to attain mastery. Learning
becomes much more student-centered and I become more of a facilitator. Even if I don’t provide a certain tool
for them during a learning unit, they may choose to use it anyway or choose
other tools to enhance their own learning.
If a student is having difficulty mastering the information,
I need to provide appropriate alternate tools to allow them to synthesize, practice,
and apply the information they’ve learned. This will also benefit those students who master the
information early on. Tutorial
videos, quizzes, polls, flashcards, threaded discussions, word searches, etc.,
can be used. And the great thing
about these formative assessments is that many of them are already created for
us! If I want to check for
understanding with an online quiz, I don’t have to recreate the wheel. I can usually find a quiz that is
already online that will fit the students’ needs. The same goes for video tutorials, flashcards, etc.
Just like in the traditional classroom, I need to
decide which formative and summative tools are the most appropriate for
each learning unit. In a fully online class, these will be Web 2.0 tools, but in a blended class (which I will be teaching) the tools may be a combination of Web 2.0 and paper-pencil, face-to-face tools. Second, I need to consider if students have used the tools before and are comfortable
with them. If not, I need to allow
students time to explore and learn how to use the tools. Third, I need to provide clear expectations for each
assessment in the form of rubrics or checklists. Fourth, I need to provide
variety and choice as much as possible to allow for differentiated and
individualized instruction.
Lastly, I need to provide for feedback and collaboration– teacher-student and/or
peer-to-peer - in a timely manner to help students gain mastery of the subject matter.
Particularly with summative assessments, I need to consider
what would be an authentic assessment tool. I tend to use more performance- or project-based assessments, where
students achieve the highest form of learning according to Bloom’s Digital
Taxonomy: creating. Next year, I
plan on incorporating ePortfolios where students can share their work. I think the quality of their work, and
their interest in learning, will be heightened if they know they are creating
projects that will be viewed by their classmates, their parents, and,
potentially, the world.
In planning a comprehensive assessment strategy for each
learning unit, it is important for me to choose both formative and summative
assessments that allow my students to collaborate and progress through the
stages of Bloom’s Taxonomy – remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing,
evaluating, and creating – to achieve the higher order and critical thinking
skills that will make them successful 21st Century learners.
No comments:
Post a Comment